<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>surfograpHIe &#187; canon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.surfographie.com/tag/canon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.surfographie.com</link>
	<description>photography,surf art,surf photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 1D M IV</title>
		<link>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/canon-miv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/canon-miv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanelacasa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfographie.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canon EOS 1D Mark IV is the fifth generation of Canon&#8217;s speed-orientated range of professional DSLRs. It retains the two-grip form factor of the original, 4MP EOS-1D launched in September 2001 (itself building on the integrated grip of the film-era EOS-1N RS, also the first to offer 10fps shooting, albeit without AF between shots). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canon EOS 1D Mark IV is the fifth generation  of Canon&#8217;s speed-orientated range of professional DSLRs. It retains the  two-grip form factor of the original, 4MP EOS-1D launched in September  2001 (itself building on the integrated grip of the film-era EOS-1N RS,  also the first to offer 10fps shooting, albeit without AF between  shots). And it&#8217;s this consistency of design, which extends to the AF  pattern and much of the control layout, that helps to explain the name &#8211;  the Mark IV really is the current point in an evolutionary process,  rather than a wholly separate model.</p>
<div id="attachment_285" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 536px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-285" href="http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/canon-miv/canon-miv/"><img class="size-full wp-image-285" title="canon MIV" src="http://www.surfographie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/canon-MIV.jpg" alt="Canon M IV" width="526" height="441" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon MIV</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>However, more than previous 1D series cameras, the  1D Mark IV has a lot to prove. Whereas, in the past, Canon&#8217;s flagship  models have been a fairly safe bet, autofocus problems with the 1D Mark  III have cast a shadow over the range. Those problems, which appear to  have come from a combination of manufacturing error, increased  complexity of AF customization and the AF sensor occasionally being  overwhelmed in bright conditions, have become notorious.</p>
<p>These issues, combined with the coincident arrival  of the Nikon D3 that offered, for the first time, an equal level of AF  sophistication, brought into question Canon&#8217;s long-held position as AF  front-runner. Since then, however, a combination of engineering  revisions and user education have meant that many shooters have been  able to use the camera without any problems &#8211; Canon admits there have  been issues, but the  woes that were so widely reported early in the  camera&#8217;s life span are unlikely still to  be affecting nearly as many  users as its internet reputation might suggest.</p>
<p>Canon is clearly hoping to assuage any doubts  still lingering after the &#8217;1D III Affair&#8217; by introducing a new AF  system. Although the 45 AF points are arranged in a layout that dates  back to 1998&#8242;s EOS 3, the 1D Mark IV uses a totally new AF sensor with  39 cross-type points that are sensitive both in the vertical and  horizontal axis. The AF point selection method has also been revised,  both for manual selection and for automated selection with subject  tracking via the new AI-Servo II system.</p>
<div id="attachment_286" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 530px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-286" href="http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/canon-miv/front-miv/"><img class="size-full wp-image-286" title="Front-MIV" src="http://www.surfographie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Front-MIV.jpg" alt="canon MIV" width="520" height="528" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon M IV front</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>The 1D Mark IV retains its predecessors&#8217; 1.3x  crop, APS-H sensor size, but this time increases its pixel count to a  whopping 16MP. This may not seem like many in the era of 25MP full-frame  DSLRs and 14MP compacts, but it&#8217;s a lot when you consider the Mark IV  still has the ability to shoot at 10 frames per second. If you consider  that this is almost the same resolution as offered by the last  generation of Canon&#8217;s studio-targeted camera, the 1Ds Mark II, but with  the ability to shoot twice as fast, then you start to appreciate what  this camera is promising to do.</p>
<h4>Model line history</h4>
<p>The EOS-1D Mark IV is the highest pixel-count 1D  series, with 50% more photosites creating a 26% increase in resolution  over the previous model. Sadly the release of the EOS-1D Mark III  coincided with one of the busiest periods in dpreview&#8217;s history  (including an office and studio move, staff recruitment and training and  more consumer level DSLR launches than ever before), meaning that,  although much work was done and thousands of sample shots were taken,  our review of that camera was never completed.</p>
<table width="520" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="89">Model</th>
<th width="67">
<div>Announced</div>
</th>
<th width="60">
<div>Effective pixels</div>
</th>
<th width="76">
<div>Sensor size</div>
</th>
<th width="115">Continuous High (JPEG)</th>
<th width="85">LCD monitor</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a>EOS-1D</a></td>
<td align="center">Sep 2001</td>
<td align="center">4.2 mp</td>
<td align="center">1.3x crop</td>
<td>8.0 fps, 21 frames</td>
<td>2.0&#8243;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a>EOS-1D  Mark II</a></td>
<td align="center">Jan 2004</td>
<td align="center">8.2 mp</td>
<td align="center">1.3x crop</td>
<td>8.3 fps, 40 frames</td>
<td>2.0&#8243;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EOS-1D Mark II N</td>
<td align="center">Aug 2005</td>
<td align="center">8.2 mp</td>
<td align="center">1.3x crop</td>
<td>8.3 fps, 48 images</td>
<td>2.5&#8243;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EOS-1D Mark III</td>
<td align="center">Feb 2007</td>
<td align="center">10.1 mp</td>
<td align="center">1.3x crop</td>
<td>10.0 fps, 110 images</td>
<td>3.0&#8243; (Live view)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EOS-1D Mark IV</td>
<td align="center">Oct 2009</td>
<td align="center">16.0 mp</td>
<td align="center">1.3x crop</td>
<td>10.0 fps, 121 images*</td>
<td>3.0&#8243; (Live view)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/canon-miv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon PowerShot G11</title>
		<link>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/274/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/274/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanelacasa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point and shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfographie.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review based on a production Canon PowerShot G11, Firmware version 1.00 The Powershot G series has represented a fairly formidable presence at the top of the compact camera tree. From a keen photographer point-of-view, there&#8217;s little on the market that can match its mixture of zoom range, lens flexibility, build quality and level of manual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 530px"><a href="http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG11/Images/Intro.jpg"><img style="margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px;" title="Canon PowerShot G11" src="http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG11/Images/Intro-001.jpg" alt="" vspace="20" width="520" height="420" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon PowerShot G11</p></div>
<p><strong>Review based on a production Canon PowerShot G11, Firmware  version 1.00 </strong></p>
<p>The Powershot G series has represented a  fairly formidable presence at the top of the compact camera tree. From a  keen photographer point-of-view, there&#8217;s little on the market  that can  match its mixture of zoom range, lens flexibility, build quality and  level of manual control. Somehow Ricoh&#8217;s GX and Nikon&#8217;s P series have  never quite had the same impact but Panasonic&#8217;s LX3 has been enough to  tempt some potential customers away, with its bright lens and convincing  (for a compact) low-light performance.</p>
<p>The G11 seems determined to wrestle back  its position as undisputed champion of the market, though, incorporating  what Canon describes as a &#8216;high sensitivity&#8217; CCD. In what might be a  first, the company has reduced the pixel count in comparison to the  preceding model. In principle, there is no disadvantage to having more  pixels when you consider the whole image (other than the larger file  sizes that might slow down the camera and fill your memory card faster  and the added complication of having to apply noise reduction before  demosaicing, which is not something many people are willing or able to  do). However, the often larger photosites of a less pixel-dense sensor  will tend to receive more light, in the same exposure, making it easier  to produce an image that looks cleaner at the pixel level. Almost as if  Canon wants its flagship compact to be a handy all-rounder.</p>
<p>The body style dates back to the G7,  which upset many existing G-series owners by omitting several features  they&#8217;d become used to. Those missing features have, one-by-one, been  re-included as the range has developed, leading us to the G11, which  finally regains the fold-out, swivel display that went missing after the  G6. There&#8217;s no denying it&#8217;s a well featured camera and one with styling  that appeals to many photographers.</p>
<p>However, since the G10 arrived, Olympus  and Panasonic have released their Micro Four Thirds compact  interchangeable lens cameras, the E-P1, E-P2 and GF1, the Powershot G  series has looked like a less obvious choice. The Panasonic GF1 for  instance, is no larger than the G11 and offers a similar level of  external control (albeit without the nice retro metal dials), but is  built around a sensor with more than five-and-a-half times the surface  area. So although the GF1 and Olympuses can&#8217;t compete with the G11&#8242;s  28-140mm equivalent lens range (at least, not while remaining as compact  packages), they are likely to offer greater image quality and control  over depth of field than the small sensored Canon can.</p>
<p>Headline features</p>
<ul>
<li>10.0  Megapixel CCD sensor</li>
<li>5x  wide-angle (28-140mm equivalent) zoom  lens with optical image stabilizer</li>
<li>2.8” tilt/swivel LCD (461k dot  resolution)</li>
<li>RAW  image recording</li>
<li>Claimed 2-stop advantage in low light  compared to G10</li>
<li>Dedicated Exposure Compensation and ISO  dials</li>
<li>DIGIC 4 processor</li>
<li>i-Contrast boosts brightness and retains detail  in  dark areas</li>
<li>26 shooting modes with manual control and  custom  settings</li>
<li>Accessories include tele-converter,  Speedlights  flashes and waterproof case</li>
<li>VGA movies, 30fps</li>
</ul>
<p>Changes compared to G10</p>
<ul>
<li>10 megapixel &#8216;high sensitivity&#8217; sensor, down from 14.7  megapixels</li>
<li>Gains ISO 3200 as full setting (Rather than  option-limited scene mode)</li>
<li>White balance fine tuning</li>
<li>Tilt and swivel LCD 2.8&#8243; (rather than 3&#8243; fixed screen)</li>
<li>New Low Light and Quick Shot modes</li>
<li>HDMI connector</li>
<li>No Superfine JPEG compression (Fine is least  compressed option)</li>
<li>No voice annotation or sound recording function</li>
<li>No remote (tethered) image capture</li>
</ul>
<p>DP review is the best place for camera review.</p>
<h4>Powershot G11 against its peers</h4>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 530px"><a href="http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG11/Images/sibebyside2.jpg"><img title="Canon PowerShot G11" src="http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG11/Images/sibebyside2-001.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="201" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon PowerShot G11</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfographie.com/2010/05/22/274/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
